Password:
Registration

Also in this section:

AL JAZEERA AS THE GREY EXCELLENCY OF THE NEW CALIPHATE

LIBYA IS MERELY THE BEGINNING. Are we to face an age of colonial wars?

DOLLARS VS RUSSIA. Part II

DOLLARS VS RUSSIA. Part I

BATTLE FOR THE EAST. Part III. Internet-revolution, waged from abroad

BATTLE FOR TRIPOLI: THE NATO HAS MADE ITS MIND FOR THE «POINTED» GROUND OPERATION?

BATTLE FOR THE EAST. Part II. Is Egyptian April 6 Movement an Arabian Otpor?

Death of Polish Robin Hood

BATTLE FOR THE EAST. Part I. The reverse of the Arab Spring

GLOBAL MEDIA AND RUSSIA: BIAS OR THE INFORMATION WAR?

Main | WORLD INVESTIGATION NET | (08/06/10) FRACTALS AND THE "BRITISH PETROLEUM": Side notes



FRACTALS AND THE "BRITISH PETROLEUM": Side notes

Due to the catastrophe in the Mexican Gulf, the word on the streets is the "British Petroleum". We, however, are willing to continue our conversation not about the accident in the Mexican Gulf itself, but rather about the most curious moments of transnational capitalism history itself. While discussing the peculiarities of this system — once dubbed the "world of shadows that is occasionally lit by the beams of light" by a major Russian politician — we might be guided by the definition of such contemporary term as the "fractals".




Due to the catastrophe in the Mexican Gulf, the word on the streets is the "British Petroleum". We, however, are willing to continue our conversation not about the accident in the Mexican Gulf itself, but rather about the most curious moments of transnational capitalism history itself. While discussing the peculiarities of this system — once dubbed the "world of shadows that is occasionally lit by the beams of light" by a major Russian politician — we might be guided by the definition of such contemporary term as the "fractals". Fractal (from Latin "fractus" — fractured) is a term introduced by Benoit Mandelbrot in 1975 to describe the irregular and yet self-resembling structures. Even the small part of a fractal contains the full information about whole fractal.

Official history claims that in May of 1901 British aristocrat William Knox D’Arcy — who succeeded at the gold-mining in Australia — "was granted the approval of Persian government" for the geological exploration and production of oil. A bit less official version adds that the "approval" was obtained thanks to the series of bribes to the corrupted Persian bureaucrats and noblemen, crowned by the payment of £5000 (just for some out-of-pocket expenses) to the Persian Shah himself, who was selling out the future of the dependent country for the sake of his personal prosperity. "Approval" actually meant concession — minor part for the needs of local "leadership", a little bit — to the treasury and the rest — to the Western shareholders — usual scheme for the "Eastern expansion". At that time it was just the royalty — nominal charge for the right to extract the natural resources — that was left in the production country. Third-world countries took the audacity to impose the tax for the concessionaire’s profits only in the second half of the 20th century.

Some time ago, at the threshold of the prospective development of the Iranian oil fields — oil was considered to be the fuel of the future even then — D’Arcy needed the sponsors, and the British fleet, standing at the verge of the world re-division — needed the black oil. After the conversation with the British government it was the Scotland-based "Burmah Oil" that funded D’Arcy — soon it became the main shareholder of the newly-founded "Anglo-Persian oil company". By the way, "Burmah Oil" was founded by a certain gentleman whose last name was Cargill. We’d recommend you to enter this name at the search system and look at the results.

Mr. D’Arcy himself passed away in 1917 but that didn’t affect business much. On the verge of the First World War Winston Churchill — big friend of all the colonial resources producers — induced the British Cabinet of Ministers to buy the main share at the "Anglo-Persian oil company". Refining facilities were passed to the operating company, and then the "British Petroleum" petrol station network, which was the leading one at the British Islands at the moment. Actually it was an asset of the German "Deutsche Bank" that was negotiating the Romanian oil via it, but with the start of the First World War, it was quite naturally expropriated by the British government and thus, the latter acquired the full-cycled oil production and refining and extracted the profits for the corresponding manufacture.

In reality British government acted as functionary, serious gentlemen with the private capital from the profitable companies haven’t ever disappeared. All the more, during the period between the two world wars the company that became the "Anglo-Iranian" one managed to achieve quite significant successes, going with the times and thoroughly developing itself. The twentieth century was the century of oil and the "seven sisters" — seven leading Anglo-American oil companies, including the BP as of right — profiteered on that rather nicely.

By the way, it was the Italian post-war Prime Minister Enrico Mattei who introduced the phrase "seven sisters" — he quite disliked these "sharks" and tried to defend Italy from them. Enrico died at the airplane accident that — as it turned out nowadays — took place because of the diversion. But even 10 years before the death of Italian Prime Minister, it was far too patriotic Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh who paid a high price for his counter-action to the "British Petroleum" interests.

We should note that the oil business, banking capital, venture investments and the financial speculations represent the tightly intertwined teams of the financiers, architects of the New world order established after the Second World War. We may just glance at the biographies of American and British political establishment in order to figure out that it makes up an integral part of this "business". Since the 1970s when the U. S. government headed by Jimmy Carter and Anglo-American "business-pool" pulled a trick and deprived dollar of the gold backing, "seven sisters", including "British Petroleum" started to make decent money at the world-scale money-from-nothing system that eventually led to the recent financial crisis. Of course, they were simultaneously investing into the alternative energy sources and the "Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan" oil-pipeline, for that matter.

But since the 1980s — when the British authorities officially got rid of their last BP shares — the main functions of the BP seemingly included the accumulation of the oil industry assets. In 1988 "British Petroleum" acquired Britoil, that was engaged in the North Sea oil fields prospecting and inherited British National Oil Corporation (BCNOC) in 1982 — it once used to be responsible for the oil deposits of the United Kingdom. In 1987 "British Petroleum" merged with Standart Oil — one of the "sisters", originated by the Rockefeller family. BP gave up Amoco — another "child" of theirs that was singled out in 1911 during the short-termed U. S. authorities attempt to fight the monopolism — in the end of 1990s when it became clear that it was not the oil-production revival in the USA on the agenda of the day but yet another Eastern colonization (starting from Iraq). In 2000 BP bought ARCO with its Alaska assets. It also got the "Castrol" (heiress of the "Burmah Oil" itself) — Cargill family has recently switched to the genetic engineering at the rural area — and ARAL (former German consortium with the developed oil production, refining and selling infrastructure).

Though, since recently it turned out to be dangerous to head this gigantic structure. British aristocrat John Brown, member of House of Lords, Baron of Madingley, owner of several scientific degrees and honorable titles, became a member of the huge scandal a year before scheduled honorable retirement from the post that he seated since 2001 (he became a member of House of Lords the same year). Following the deaths of 15 workers at the refining facility in Texas and the leak from the corroded pipeline in Alaska, Brown attempted to lie during the story with publication of his ex-lover’s novels. Due to the premature resignation he was deprived of the annual bonus of £3.5 million ($7 million, 1.3 part of his annual salary) and the option for acquiring the shares of maximum value of £12 million ($23.8) in 2007-2009. He also had to leave his eminent positions at the board of Goldman Sachs financial group. He is probably comforted by the post of the Royal Engineer Academy President and his salaries at Riverstone Holdings LLC, one of the structures, profiteering from the energetic field.

Current top-manager Tom Hayward now also has the reason for premature resignation. However, taking his positions at the Citigroup financial group and the post at the Chartered Management Institute (recognized British centre for the international management training) into consideration, he would also find something to comfort himself with. He would have to leave the much-talked-about "Bilderberg Group". However, there’s already the constant representative of "British Petroleum" over there — Peter Sutherland, company’s board chair, one of the Goldman Sachs leaders and the head of London school of economics, who failed to become a head of the Euro-commission in 2004. Still, he used to be the head of the World Trade Organization in 1995.

Current crisis, catastrophe at the Mexican Gulf and the show trials over the Goldman Sachs tricksters may, from one hand, be the forerunners of the major changes in life of the most famous Western oil company. From the other hand, they still may turn out to be zilch. The essence lies too deep, you see.

By Marat Kunaev

Main | WORLD INVESTIGATION NET | FRACTALS AND THE "BRITISH PETROLEUM": Side notes
Message
Author: Anonymous   (Registration)

Title


Message


Input the word you see below